Making a Difference in One’s Immediate World
One DayMaking a Difference in One’s Immediate World is Emma Morley’s alternative to the grand promise of changing the entire world: meaningful change begins with the people and circumstances close at hand. The idea first takes shape as a private principle for facing adult life, then acquires practical form in Emma’s work with a theatre co-operative. Its force lies in the distance between the hope of changing lives through art and the harder question of whether her own efforts make any difference.
A modest ambition
On the morning after her graduation-night encounter with Dexter Mayhew, Emma gives the principle its concise form. She is not claiming that one person can remake the whole world; she is arguing for change within the small area around that person. The distinction lowers the scale of the task without abandoning its moral seriousness. Making a difference is neither a promise of sweeping transformation nor an excuse for doing nothing: it is an obligation tied to one’s immediate reach.
The idea emerges in an intimate conversation, as Emma and Dexter lie together in a single bed on Rankeillor Street in Edinburgh. They laugh at the earnestness of what she has said, and Emma recognizes that the formulation sounds corny. That self-consciousness matters. The principle is not presented as polished doctrine or as a speech meant to persuade an audience; it is a tentative belief spoken aloud in the vulnerable aftermath of a night together. Its modest scale makes it usable, even as Emma is embarrassed by its idealism.
The same belief becomes more elaborate in Emma’s thoughts as she considers the unsettled prospect of independent adult life. She does not feel prepared for the end of university, and imagines herself standing outside a fire alarm with her clothes in her arms: learning has ended, but she does not yet know what will fill the days ahead. Against that anxiety, she assembles a personal programme. Courage and boldness should lead to useful work; art might change lives; writing should be done beautifully; friendship, principles, passionate experience, love, and ordinary self-care all belong to a life lived well. A new Smith Corona electric typewriter gives that ambition a concrete companion, but not a defined career. Emma has a direction of travel, not a settled destination.
From belief to theatrical work
Emma’s choice to join Sledgehammer Theatre Co-operative turns the principle outward. She has no great ambition to become an actress and does not value theatre simply as performance. What attracts her is its capacity to carry words and ideas, and the co-operative’s promise of shared intentions, a written manifesto, and a commitment to changing young lives through art. She packs her rucksack and leaves her sceptical parents as though setting out on a cause. The Arts Council-funded venture gives her belief a collective method: make work together, take it to young audiences, and treat art as a means of intervention rather than an end in itself.
In a letter to Dexter dated 15 July 1989, Emma describes four months of devising, rehearsing, and touring Cruel Cargo, an educational production about the slave trade. She plays Lydia, the vain daughter of a slave owner, who comes to recognize that her finery has been bought with the suffering of enslaved people. Emma can describe the play’s theatrical devices with comic exaggeration, but she insists that the work matters. Workshops in schools feel exciting to her, and she is struck by how little the children know about their cultural heritage, including children of West Indian background. The immediate audience is the point: the theatre’s ambition to challenge prejudice proceeds one child at a time, not through a claim to transform society all at once.
Emma’s confidence in the work is therefore specific rather than abstract. She has enjoyed writing the production and says it has given her ideas for other plays. She also sees the school workshops as an opportunity to reach children whose knowledge of history and heritage seems limited. Her hope that theatre can change things is ambitious, but its proposed mechanism is local: a performance, a conversation, a workshop, an individual young audience member reconsidering what they have been taught. The principle survives by being translated into circumstances and people she can actually encounter.
The test of practice
The co-operative’s ideals are not self-validating. Three months after Emma sets out, the warmth, camaraderie, and sense of social purpose she expected have become difficult to find. The word co-operative remains stencilled on the side of the van, a visible promise that no longer settles the question of how the group lives up to it. Sid’s blunt complaint that he hates the job interrupts the idealized picture of shared commitment. Emma presses her hands to her ears and asks whether she is really making a difference. The question marks a turn: the principle that once steadied her now becomes a standard her experience may fail to meet.
This doubt does not simply cancel her belief. It exposes the difference between an institution’s declared purpose and the texture of participating in it. Sledgehammer’s manifesto and educational aims offer a reason to join, but they cannot guarantee that daily work will preserve the warmth or social value Emma imagined. The work itself also has limits: Cruel Cargo reaches particular school audiences, and Emma can report responses and workshops, but the evidence does not establish that prejudice has been banished or that the children’s lives have been permanently changed. Her conviction is sincere; its outcomes remain uncertain.
Meaning and tension
The concept’s central tension is between a large moral hope and a small field of action. Emma’s early formulation avoids the impossible burden of changing everything, while her later theatre work shows how local effort might have consequences. Yet the same modesty sharpens the question of responsibility: if change is supposed to begin nearby, disappointment cannot be dismissed as somebody else’s problem. Emma asks directly whether her work matters, rather than treating good intentions as proof that it does.
The idea also links private orientation to public practice. At first, making a difference sits among Emma’s proposed ways of living: write, cherish friends, keep faith with principles, and experience life fully. In the co-operative, it becomes a shared artistic and educational project. The movement from inward resolve to work with young audiences gives the concept its substance, while the later doubts prevent it from becoming a simple celebration of idealism. Making a Difference in One’s Immediate World is thus both Emma’s guiding belief and a question she must keep asking of the life built around it.
